Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Department could challenge the refund sanction on a ground not alleged in the show cause notice, and whether the respondent was entitled to the sanctioned refund under Notification No. 17/2009-ST dated 07.07.2009.
Analysis: The refund claim was examined with reference to the conditions in the notification and the supporting invoices and bills. The only allegations in the show cause notice related to non-furnishing of the chartered accountant certificate for claims exceeding 0.25% of FOB value and non-submission of relevant invoices and bills. The notice did not allege that the respondent had exported a lesser quantity than that shown in the shipping bills. Since the show cause notice is the foundation of the proceedings, the Department could not raise a new factual ground in appeal that was never put to the respondent.
Conclusion: The refund sanction could not be assailed on a ground absent from the show cause notice, and the finding sustaining refund of Rs.53,73,949/- was upheld.