Bail in alleged input credit misuse: SC held continued custody unnecessary after charge-sheet filing and co-accused bail.

In an SC bail matter arising from alleged misuse of input credit, the Court held that continued pre-trial detention was unnecessary because the appellant had remained in custody since 27.01.2022, the charge-sheet had been filed, and a similarly placed co-accused had already been granted bail. On that basis, the refusal of relief was set aside and bail was granted. The decision reflects the principle that once investigation is complete and further custody is not required, pre-trial incarceration should not be prolonged.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant, arrested in connection with alleged misuse of input credit, was entitled to bail pending trial.

Analysis: The Court noted that the appellant had remained in custody since 27.01.2022, the charge-sheet had already been filed, and a co-accused had been enlarged on bail. In these circumstances, further detention pending trial was found unnecessary.

Conclusion: Bail was granted and the order refusing relief was set aside, in favour of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: Where investigation is complete and continued detention is not necessary, especially when a similarly placed co-accused has already been granted bail, pre-trial custody should not be prolonged.

---