TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Fraudulent GST Registration Exposed: Identity Theft Probe Ordered with Comprehensive Investigation and Victim's Legal Recourse Preserved</h1> <h3>Anil Kumar Versus The GST Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise And Ors.</h3> Anil Kumar Versus The GST Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise And Ors. - 2023 (73) G. S. T. L. 59 (Del.) Issues:1. Unauthorized GST registration obtained in petitioner's name.2. Allegations of fraudulent actions and filing returns without petitioner's knowledge.3. Role of respondent authorities in addressing the petitioner's grievances.4. Examination of petitioner's representation by concerned authorities.5. Disclosure of identity of friend to whom petitioner handed over identity documents.6. Direction for cooperation with authorities and available legal remedies.Issue 1: Unauthorized GST registration obtained in petitioner's nameThe petitioner, a street vendor, discovered a GST registration under a firm's name misusing his identity documents. The firm was registered with the GST Department without his knowledge or consent, leading to potential GST liabilities and returns filed without his awareness.Issue 2: Allegations of fraudulent actions and filing returns without petitioner's knowledgeThe petitioner raised concerns about potential GST demands due to fraudulent actions by unknown individuals who registered the firm in his name. The petitioner also highlighted that the unknown persons have been filing returns without his authorization, causing further distress.Issue 3: Role of respondent authorities in addressing the petitioner's grievancesThe respondent authorities, including the GST Commissioner and Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, clarified that they were not directly involved in the unauthorized registration issue as it falls under the State GST authorities' jurisdiction. The Delhi Police accepted a representation from the petitioner for examination.Issue 4: Examination of petitioner's representation by concerned authoritiesThe Court directed the State GST authorities to treat the petition as a representation and examine the petitioner's grievance as per the law. The petitioner was instructed to cooperate fully, disclose the identity of the friend to whom identity documents were given, and provide necessary information to the police and GST authorities.Issue 5: Disclosure of identity of friend to whom petitioner handed over identity documentsThe petitioner was directed to reveal the identity of the friend to whom he handed over his Aadhar Card and PAN Card for obtaining a loan. This disclosure was deemed essential for the investigation and resolution of the unauthorized registration issue.Issue 6: Direction for cooperation with authorities and available legal remediesThe Court emphasized the petitioner's cooperation with authorities and granted liberty to avail of legal remedies if the grievance remained unresolved. It was clarified that the Court did not express any opinion on the allegations' merits, disposing of the petition accordingly.
TaxTMI 