Dismissed: Writ against Show Cause Notice; Customs Authorities' Jurisdiction Upheld

The High Court at Calcutta dismissed a writ petition challenging the validity of a Show Cause Notice issued by the Assistant Collector of Customs. The Court held that no writ lies against a show cause notice as it does not constitute a judicial or quasi-judicial order. Mandamus cannot be issued in such cases, and the Customs Authorities have the jurisdiction to issue show cause notices. The Court emphasized that if the petitioner disagrees with the decision, remedies are available before the Appellate authority and the Court. The writ petition was dismissed without costs.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to Show Cause Notice validity.

The High Court at Calcutta heard a writ petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to withdraw a Show Cause Notice issued by the Assistant Collector of Customs. The petitioner imported raw materials from a German company through an Indian agent. The Customs Authorities alleged that the goods were not meant for use in leather industries as per the standard program given by the manufacturer. The petitioners contended that the Show Cause Notice was issued arbitrarily and without proper application of mind. They argued that the demand for submission of manufacturer's catalog/literature was wrongful as the Invoices already confirmed the goods' suitability for leather stamping. The respondent Customs Authorities contested the petition, filing a comprehensive Affidavit-in-Opposition. Both parties' lawyers made lengthy submissions, citing various decisions. The Court found the scope of the petition limited as it challenged the show cause notice without a final adjudication. Referring to a Supreme Court decision, the Court held that no writ lies against a show cause notice as there is no judicial or quasi-judicial order. Mandamus cannot be issued in such cases, and the authorities have the jurisdiction to issue show cause notices. The Court dismissed the writ petition, stating that if the decision is erroneous, the petitioner has remedies before the Appellate authority and the Court. The judgment concluded by dismissing the writ petition without costs.

---