Economic offence and bogus input tax credit allegations justified refusal of regular bail amid prima facie complicity.

Regular bail was declined where the material showed prima facie participation in creating fake firms, preparing forged documents, and passing bogus input tax credit through paper transactions. The court treated the alleged forgery, conspiracy, and tax fraud as a serious economic offence, noting recovery of incriminating documents and substantial loss to the Government exchequer. On that material, the gravity of the offence and the apparent complicity of the accused weighed against release on bail.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to regular bail in a case involving alleged forgery, conspiracy, and bogus input tax credit fraud causing loss to the Government exchequer.

Analysis: The allegations disclosed active participation in creating fake firms, preparing forged documents, and using bogus input tax credit through paper transactions. The material on record indicated prima facie complicity, recovery of incriminating documents, and involvement in an economic offence involving substantial loss to the Government exchequer. In such circumstances, the seriousness of the charge and the gravity of the offence weighed against grant of bail.

Conclusion: Regular bail was declined.

---