Appeal allowed for Section 54B exemption claim under Income Tax Act

The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal for statistical purposes, directing the issue back to the Assessing Officer for verification of compliance with Section 54B for claiming exemption under the Income Tax Act. The appellant was instructed to provide necessary documentation without unnecessary delays, and the AO was mandated to afford three effective opportunities for the appellant's case, emphasizing a decision in accordance with the law.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Lack of sufficient and effective opportunity for the appellant.
2. The appellant's failure to receive notices due to a change of residence.
3. Denial of exemption under Section 54B of the Income Tax Act.
4. Requirement of filing a return of income for claiming exemption under Section 54B.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Lack of Sufficient and Effective Opportunity for the Appellant:
The appellant contended that the assessment and appellate proceedings were completed without giving sufficient and effective opportunity, thereby opposing principles of law and equity. The authorities were criticized for not accommodating the appellant's circumstances adequately, which included a change of residence that led to non-receipt of notices.

2. The Appellant's Failure to Receive Notices Due to Change of Residence:
The appellant argued that after receiving a notice from the DDIT (Inv.), Mysore, he had shifted his residence and consequently did not receive any subsequent notices issued during the assessment proceedings. This non-receipt of notices was a significant factor in the appellant's non-compliance with procedural requirements.

3. Denial of Exemption Under Section 54B of the Income Tax Act:
The appellant claimed exemption under Section 54B, which was denied by the CIT(A) on the grounds that the appellant had not filed the Income Tax Return (ITR) or furnished necessary details before the Assessing Officer (AO). The appellant argued that he had purchased two agricultural lands qualifying for the exemption and that the denial was unjustified merely due to non-filing of the return.

4. Requirement of Filing a Return of Income for Claiming Exemption Under Section 54B:
The appellant's representative argued that Section 54B does not mandate the filing of a return of income for claiming the exemption. The representative requested that the matter be remitted back to the AO for verification of the purchase of agricultural land. The Department's representative countered that the return of income is required to be filed as per Section 139(1) for claiming exemption under Section 54B, referencing the sixth Proviso of Section 139(1).

Tribunal's Findings:
The Tribunal noted that the appellant had transferred five acres of land and entered into a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) without filing a return of income for the relevant assessment year. The appellant did not appear before the AO during the assessment proceedings. However, additional documents were submitted before the CIT(A) for claiming exemption under Section 54B, which were not entertained due to the non-filing of the return.

The Tribunal observed that the amendment to Section 139(1) requiring the filing of a return for claiming exemptions under Section 54B was effective from 01.04.2020, while the case pertained to AY 2006-07. Therefore, the requirement to file a return for claiming exemption did not apply to the appellant's case.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO for verification of whether the appellant fulfilled the conditions of Section 54B for claiming exemption. The appellant was directed to provide necessary documents to substantiate his claim and to avoid unnecessary adjournments. The AO was instructed to give three effective opportunities to the appellant and decide the issue as per law.

Judgment:
The appeal of the appellant was allowed for statistical purposes, and the order was pronounced on 08th February 2023.

---