Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (2) TMI 184 - HC - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Remanded show cause notices remained pending under the dispute-resolution scheme, so rejection of declarations was unsustainable. A remanded excise show cause notice remained pending for purposes of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, because the original ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Remanded show cause notices remained pending under the dispute-resolution scheme, so rejection of declarations was unsustainable.

                            A remanded excise show cause notice remained pending for purposes of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, because the original adjudication had been set aside and no final de novo decision existed on the relevant date. Rejection of declarations on the ground that the notices had already been finally heard or concluded was unsustainable. The later expiry of the Scheme did not defeat declarations filed within its currency, and an earlier writ petition dealing only with an interim pre-deposit order did not render the petitioner ineligible. The rejection orders were set aside and the matter was directed to be reconsidered for appropriate relief under the Scheme after hearing the petitioner.




                            Issues: (i) Whether the declarations under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 were wrongly rejected on the ground that the show cause notices had already been finally heard or otherwise stood concluded. (ii) Whether the pendency of the show cause notices after remand by the appellate tribunal entitled the petitioner to relief under the Scheme, and whether the expiry of the Scheme or dismissal of an earlier writ petition defeated such entitlement.

                            Issue (i): Whether the declarations under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 were wrongly rejected on the ground that the show cause notices had already been finally heard or otherwise stood concluded.

                            Analysis: The Scheme extended relief to tax dues relatable to show cause notices pending as on 30 June 2019, and excluded only those cases where an appeal had been finally heard on or before that date. The show cause notices in question had been carried in appeal, the original adjudication had been set aside, and the matter had been remanded for de novo adjudication. No final adjudication after remand had been shown to exist on the relevant date. The basis taken in the rejection orders, namely that the notices had already been adjudicated and upheld, did not accord with the actual procedural position after remand.

                            Conclusion: The rejection of the declarations on the footing that the matter had already been finally heard was unsustainable and was against the petitioner.

                            Issue (ii): Whether the pendency of the show cause notices after remand by the appellate tribunal entitled the petitioner to relief under the Scheme, and whether the expiry of the Scheme or dismissal of an earlier writ petition defeated such entitlement.

                            Analysis: Once the appellate tribunal set aside the original order and remanded the matter, the tax dues remained relatable to pending show cause notices for the purpose of the Scheme. The Scheme had been invoked within the extended time and the later expiry of the Scheme did not defeat declarations already filed during its currency. The earlier writ petition, which concerned only an interim pre-deposit order and had no bearing on the revived adjudication, could not be treated as rendering the declarations ineligible. The additional objection regarding proof of deposit also could not sustain the rejection in the circumstances found by the Court.

                            Conclusion: The petitioner remained eligible for consideration under the Scheme, and the respondents' objections based on expiry of the Scheme and the earlier writ petition were rejected, against the respondents.

                            Final Conclusion: The impugned rejection orders were set aside and the matter was directed to be reconsidered for granting appropriate relief under the Scheme after hearing the petitioner.

                            Ratio Decidendi: Where an original excise adjudication is set aside in appeal and the matter is remanded for fresh adjudication, the resulting show cause notice remains pending for the purpose of an amnesty or dispute-resolution scheme that applies to pending notices on the relevant date, and such eligibility is not defeated merely because an earlier, unrelated procedural writ petition was dismissed or the scheme later expired.


                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found