Tribunal Upholds Financial Creditor's Section 7 Application under I&B Code

The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, upholding the order admitting the Section 7 Application by the Financial Creditor under the I&B Code, 2016. The Tribunal found that the breach of consent terms did not prevent the Financial Creditor from initiating the application as the nature of the debt claimed remained financial. It was determined that the original financial debt, not just the breach of consent terms, formed the basis of the application. The Tribunal also clarified that the Financial Creditor was entitled to file the application independently despite the inaction of majority debenture holders.

---

---

Issues:
Admission of Section 7 Application based on breach of consent terms, maintainability of Section 7 application due to breach of consent terms, nature of debt claimed in Section 7 Application, reliance on previous judgments, entitlement of financial creditor to initiate Section 7 application.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against the order admitting a Section 7 Application by the Financial Creditor under the I&B Code, 2016, based on a breach of consent terms. The Financial Creditor had initially filed an application under Section 7, but a consent terms agreement was reached, leading to the withdrawal of the original Company Petition. However, when the consent terms were breached by the Corporate Debtor, instead of reviving the earlier petition, a fresh one was filed, which was admitted by the Adjudicating Authority, leading to the appeal.

The Appellant argued that the breach of consent terms did not give the right to initiate a Section 7 Application as it does not constitute financial debt. They relied on previous judgments to support their position. The Respondent contended that the nature of debt claimed remained financial, and the fresh application was valid, given the terms of the consent agreement.

The Tribunal examined the consent terms and the details of the financial debt claimed in the Section 7 Application. It noted that the application was based on the original financial debt extended by the Financial Creditor, not just the breach of consent terms. The Tribunal distinguished the present case from the judgments relied upon by the Appellant, emphasizing that the nature of the financial debt was not altered by the breach of consent terms.

Regarding the entitlement of the Financial Creditor to file the Section 7 Application, the Tribunal held that the majority debenture holders' inaction did not preclude the Financial Creditor from initiating the application independently. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that if a settlement was reached, the parties could file an application under Section 12-A of the I&B Code. The impugned order admitting the Section 7 Application was upheld, finding no error in the decision.

---