Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the show cause notice issued under Section 73 of the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the consequential summary in FORM GST DRC-01 and summary of order in FORM GST DRC-07 were liable to be quashed for being vague and for non-compliance with the principles of natural justice.
Analysis: The notice was found to be issued in a standard format without striking out irrelevant particulars and without clearly stating the contravention alleged against the assessee. The summary in FORM GST DRC-01 could not cure that defect, and the subsequent issuance of FORM GST DRC-07 was treated as having been made without proper adjudication. The Court held that a notice under Section 73 is not a mere formality and must clearly disclose the charge so that an effective reply can be made. Since the procedural requirements and fair hearing safeguards were not followed, the objection based on alternate remedy was not accepted.
Conclusion: The impugned notice and consequential proceedings were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh action from the stage of issuing a proper show cause notice in accordance with law.