Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to exemption from purchase tax under Section 7-A of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 on the footing that the purchase of raw hides and skins was in the course of export and protected by Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.
Analysis: The liability to purchase tax arose because the petitioner bought raw hides and skins without tax, converted them into dressed hides and skins, and then exported them. The statutory protection under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 is available only where the last purchase or sale preceding export is made for complying with a pre-existing export order and is inextricably linked to the actual export. The governing principle remains that the goods purchased and the goods exported must retain their identity unless the facts establish a legally sufficient link between the local purchase and the export. On the facts found, there was no material to show such a link, and the goods exported were not the same as the goods purchased because of the change in character caused by processing.
Conclusion: The petitioner was not entitled to exemption from purchase tax, and the levy under Section 7-A was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition failed on merits because the export-linked exemption could not be claimed after transformation of the purchased goods, and the assessment and appellate orders were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption under Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 is available only when the local purchase and the export are inseverably connected and the goods exported are identifiable with the goods purchased; transformation of the goods breaks that claim.