Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (1) TMI 1060 - HC - Customs

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court classifies imported goods as 'buttons/snap buttons' under exemption; Customs duty orders set aside. The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, determining that their imported goods should be classified as 'buttons/snap buttons' under the exemption ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Court classifies imported goods as "buttons/snap buttons" under exemption; Customs duty orders set aside.

                            The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, determining that their imported goods should be classified as "buttons/snap buttons" under the exemption provided in Notification No.21/2002 and its equivalent in Notification No.12/2012. The court set aside the orders demanding customs duty, emphasizing that the relief granted applies only to the specific consignments in question. The revenue department retains the right to verify future consignments for compliance with the relevant notifications.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Classification of imported goods (buttons/snap buttons vs. fasteners).
                            2. Applicability of exemption under Notification No.21/2002 and Notification No.12/2012.
                            3. Legality of reclassification by the revenue department.
                            4. Jurisdiction and discretion of the court in adjudicating the classification dispute.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Classification of Imported Goods:
                            The primary issue revolves around the classification of the imported goods by the petitioners, specifically whether the imported items are "buttons/snap buttons" or "fasteners." The petitioners argued that their imported goods should be classified under Sl.No.140 of Notification No.21/2002, which pertains to "buttons/snap buttons," and thus be eligible for exemption from customs duty. The department, however, contended that the goods fall under Sl.No.167 of Notification No.21/2002, classifying them as "fasteners," and thus not eligible for the same exemption.

                            2. Applicability of Exemption under Notification No.21/2002 and Notification No.12/2012:
                            The petitioners had previously succeeded in getting their goods classified as "buttons/snap buttons" under Sl.No.140 of Notification No.21/2002 through a CESTAT ruling, which was upheld by higher courts, including the Supreme Court. However, with the introduction of Notification No.12/2012, the department reclassified the goods under Sl.No.282, arguing that the new notification changes the applicable classification. The court examined whether the earlier classification and exemption under Notification No.21/2002 should extend to the new Notification No.12/2012.

                            3. Legality of Reclassification by the Revenue Department:
                            The petitioners challenged the revenue department's orders dated 2.5.2013, 3.5.2013, and 21.06.2013, which demanded customs duty based on the reclassification of the goods as "fasteners" under Sl.No.282 of Notification No.12/2012. The court noted that the goods imported by the petitioners had not changed in nature or description from the earlier adjudicated cases. Therefore, the court found that the reclassification by the department was not justified and contrary to the earlier judgments.

                            4. Jurisdiction and Discretion of the Court in Adjudicating the Classification Dispute:
                            The single judge had dismissed the writ petition, suggesting that the matter required verification by customs authorities and that the petitioners should seek remedy through an appeal. However, the appellate court found that there was no significant difference in the goods previously adjudicated and those currently under dispute. The court held that it was unnecessary to subject the petitioners to further adjudication since the nature of the goods and their classification had already been established in earlier litigation. The court emphasized that the relief granted should be limited to the consignments in question and that the revenue department retains the right to verify future consignments.

                            Conclusion:
                            The court concluded that the goods imported by the petitioners should continue to be classified under the exemption provided in Notification No.21/2002 and its equivalent in Notification No.12/2012. The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the impugned judgment and the orders demanding customs duty. However, the court clarified that this relief is specific to the consignments in question, and the revenue department is free to examine future consignments to ensure compliance with the applicable notifications.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found