Rectification Rejected: Only Patent Errors Correctable, Final Decisions and Debatable Law Points Remain Intact.

The Tribunal's decision to reject the rectification application under Section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 was upheld. The Court concluded that rectification is limited to correcting patent errors and not for revisiting final decisions or debatable points of law. All revisions were dismissed, favoring the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether a rectification application under Section 22 of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948 could be used to reopen an order that had already attained finality, and whether a later decision of the Supreme Court could be treated as making the earlier order amenable to rectification.

Analysis: Rectification under Section 22 is confined to a mistake apparent from the record. Once the Tribunal's order had been affirmed in revision and no further challenge was taken, the matter attained finality. The later Supreme Court decision relied upon by the assessee did not convert the concluded assessment into an apparent error. The Court held that the asserted error was not self-evident and would require examination of law and facts, which places it outside the scope of rectification. A rectification power cannot be used as a substitute for appeal or review, and a debatable issue of law or disputed question of fact is not a mistake apparent from the record.

Conclusion: Rectification was not maintainable on the facts, and the assessee's challenge failed. The questions of law were answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.

---