Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessee's offline appeal could be refused on the ground that the electronic portal did not reflect the appeal and no notification had been issued permitting an alternative mode of filing.
Analysis: Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 confers a statutory right on any person aggrieved by an adjudication order to prefer an appeal. Rule 108 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 contemplates filing of the appeal electronically, or otherwise as may be notified by the Commissioner. The definition of "notify" was treated as requiring a proper notification, and in the absence of any such notification, the alternative mode of filing could not be denied. The Court also held that a circular could not substitute for the statutory requirement of notification. Since the appeal was not being reflected on the portal because of technical difficulty, the assessee could not be deprived of the appellate remedy on a purely technical ground.
Conclusion: The offline appeal was held maintainable and the impugned correspondence insisting on online acknowledgment was set aside.