TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>E-way Bill Penalty Overturned: Tax Authorities Lack Justification for Imposing Penalties Against Established GST Council Guidelines</h1> <h3>M/s Jyoti Traders Versus State of U.P. And 2 Others</h3> HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax and penalty orders related to e-way bill requirements. The court found tax authorities unjustified in ... Seeking release of seized goods alongwith conveyance - absence of E-way bill - HELD THAT:- This Court finds that the GST Council had already dispensed with the mandatory provision of carrying e-way bill till 31.03.2018. The matter was settled by Division Bench of this Court in case of M/S Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. [2018 (9) TMI 1261 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] extending the benefit to all those assessee who during the relevant period had carried the goods without the eway bill and matter is no more res integra. A coordinate Bench of this Court in case of HBL Power Systems Ltd. [2022 (8) TMI 49 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] has also taken the similar view. Petition allowed. Issues:Quashing of tax and penalty orders based on the validity of e-way bill dispensation by GST Council till 31.03.2018.Analysis:The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash the tax and penalty orders imposed by the Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax/State Tax, Mobile Squad, II Unit, Shamli, based on the interception of goods being transported from U.P. to Punjab on 21.02.2018. The petitioner argued that an e-way bill was generated on 17.02.2018, during a period when the GST Council had dispensed with the requirement of e-way bills until 31.03.2018. The petitioner relied on the decision in the case of M/S Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Others and M/S HBL Power Systems Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. & Others to support their claim.The Standing Counsel contended that the e-way bill downloaded by the petitioner had expired by the time the goods were intercepted, and the petitioner did not possess the required e-way bill as mandated under the Act/Rules. After hearing both parties and reviewing the evidence, the Court noted that the GST Council had indeed waived the necessity of carrying e-way bills until 31.03.2018. The Court referred to the decision in the case of M/S Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and M/S HBL Power Systems Ltd., which had already addressed and settled the issue regarding the dispensation of e-way bills during the relevant period.Consequently, the Court found that the tax authorities were unjustified in imposing tax and penalties on the petitioner. Therefore, the orders dated 31.07.2021 by the first appellate authority and 01.07.2020 by the Assistant Commissioner were deemed unsustainable in the eyes of the law and were quashed. The writ petition was allowed, and it was directed that the amount deposited by the petitioner pursuant to the orders be released within fifteen days.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
