Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (1) TMI 376 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court affirms deductions on foreign exchange gain, export benefits, and scrap value under section 80IC. The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal, confirming the validity of deductions on foreign exchange gain, export benefits, ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            High Court affirms deductions on foreign exchange gain, export benefits, and scrap value under section 80IC.

                            The High Court upheld the decisions of the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal, confirming the validity of deductions on foreign exchange gain, export benefits, and scrap value under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law arose for consideration.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Deletion of disallowance of deduction on foreign exchange gain under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act.
                            2. Deletion of disallowance of deduction on export benefits under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act.
                            3. Deletion of disallowance of deduction on scrap value under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Deletion of Disallowance of Deduction on Foreign Exchange Gain under Section 80IC:

                            The Revenue challenged the ITAT's decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 1,32,64,686/- on foreign exchange gain. The Assessing Officer had disallowed this amount, arguing that the foreign exchange gain did not have an immediate and direct nexus with the manufacturing activity and thus was not eligible for deduction under section 80IC. The CIT(Appeals) reversed this decision, stating that the foreign exchange fluctuation was directly linked to the business activity, as it reduced the purchase price of the product. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s decision, citing previous cases where foreign exchange gains were deemed eligible for deduction under section 80IC. The High Court referenced its earlier decision in Commissioner of Income-tax vs. ALPS Chemicals (P.) Ltd., which supported the view that foreign exchange fluctuations related to business transactions are directly linked to the business activity and thus eligible for deduction under section 80IC. Consequently, the High Court found no reason to interfere with the Tribunal's decision.

                            2. Deletion of Disallowance of Deduction on Export Benefits under Section 80IC:

                            The Revenue also contested the ITAT's decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 35,59,463/- on export benefits. The Assessing Officer had disallowed this amount, arguing that the excise duty refund did not have a first-degree nexus with the manufacturing profits. The CIT(Appeals) disagreed, stating that the excise duty refund was directly linked to the manufacturing activity, as it reduced the cost of production. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s decision, referencing the Supreme Court's decision in Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd., which held that subsidies reimbursed for manufacturing costs are directly linked to the business activity and thus eligible for deduction under sections 80IB and 80IC. The High Court agreed with the Tribunal's decision, stating that the excise duty refund had a direct nexus with the manufacturing activity and was thus eligible for deduction under section 80IC.

                            3. Deletion of Disallowance of Deduction on Scrap Value under Section 80IC:

                            The Revenue further challenged the ITAT's decision to delete the disallowance of Rs. 14,26,979/- on scrap value. The Assessing Officer had disallowed this amount, arguing that the scrap income did not have a first-degree nexus with the manufacturing profits. The CIT(Appeals) reversed this decision, citing the Delhi High Court's decision in CIT vs. Sadhu Forgings Ltd., which held that income from scrap generated during the manufacturing process is directly linked to the business activity and thus eligible for deduction under section 80IC. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(Appeals)'s decision, referencing the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Harjivandas Juthabhai Zaveri, which supported the view that income from the sale of scrap is directly connected with the manufacturing activities and thus eligible for deduction under section 80IC. The High Court found no reason to interfere with the Tribunal's decision.

                            Conclusion:

                            The High Court dismissed the appeal, concluding that no substantial question of law arose for consideration. The decisions of the CIT(Appeals) and the Tribunal were upheld, confirming that the deductions on foreign exchange gain, export benefits, and scrap value under section 80IC were valid.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found