Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2023 (1) TMI 328 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Validity of Income Tax Transfer Order Upheld under Section 127 The court upheld the validity of the transfer order under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, transferring the petitioner's income tax assessment ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Validity of Income Tax Transfer Order Upheld under Section 127

                          The court upheld the validity of the transfer order under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, transferring the petitioner's income tax assessment from Kolkata to New Delhi. The court found the transfer order to be based on concrete material and necessary for a coordinated investigation, dismissing the petitioner's claims of arbitrariness and inconvenience. The court emphasized the administrative nature of such transfers and the adherence to principles of natural justice, ultimately denying the writ petition and directing completion of the assessment within the legal timeframe.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of the transfer order under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Alleged violation of principles of natural justice.
                          3. Presence of financial nexus and cogent material for transfer.
                          4. Inconvenience to the petitioner versus public interest.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of the Transfer Order under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
                          The petitioner challenged the transfer of his income tax assessment from Kolkata to New Delhi, arguing that the transfer order was arbitrary, lacked adequate reasoning, and violated principles of natural justice. The court, however, emphasized that the transfer order under Section 127 is more administrative than quasi-judicial. The court cited precedents including *Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India* and *Ajantha Industries v. Central Board of Direct Taxes*, asserting that the power to transfer is guided by the purpose of the Act and is not arbitrary. The court concluded that the transfer order was valid, as it was based on concrete material and was necessary for coordinated investigation.

                          2. Alleged Violation of Principles of Natural Justice:
                          The petitioner claimed that the transfer order was issued without considering his objections and without providing an opportunity for a fair hearing. The court noted that the petitioner had been given ample opportunity to present his case, and the tax authorities had followed due process as required under Section 127 of the Act. The court highlighted that the principles of natural justice were adhered to, as the petitioner was granted sufficient opportunity to make his case, and a reasoned order was communicated.

                          3. Presence of Financial Nexus and Cogent Material for Transfer:
                          The court examined whether there was a financial nexus between the petitioner and the incriminating materials found during the search operations. The tax authorities had linked the petitioner to suspicious cash transactions and unaccounted money trails, including a significant sum of Rs. 20 crores allegedly transferred from the petitioner's residence. The court found that there was enough material to establish a nexus, including documents and statements from involved persons, which justified the need for a coordinated investigation. The court held that the transfer was based on cogent material and not mere conjectures.

                          4. Inconvenience to the Petitioner versus Public Interest:
                          The petitioner argued that the transfer would cause him significant inconvenience, as his assessments had always been done in Kolkata, where his permanent residence and accounts staff were located. The court, however, emphasized that the inconvenience to the petitioner was outweighed by the public interest in effective tax collection and coordinated investigation. The court noted that the petitioner was a highly influential person with significant presence in Delhi, including an official residence and bank accounts, and thus, the inconvenience claimed was unsubstantiated.

                          Conclusion:
                          The court concluded that the transfer order under Section 127 was valid and justified, as it was based on concrete material and necessary for coordinated investigation. The court dismissed the writ petition, finding no reason to interfere with the impugned order, and directed the tax authorities to complete the assessment within the legally allowed timeframe. The court also rejected the petitioner's request for a stay of the judgment.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found