TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal partially allows appeals on interest income and profit estimation.</h1> <h3>Shri Puttiakula Prathap Reddy, Chittoor Versus A.C.I.T. Circle 1 (1) Tirupati</h3> Shri Puttiakula Prathap Reddy, Chittoor Versus A.C.I.T. Circle 1 (1) Tirupati - TMI Issues Involved:- Appeal against orders dated 25.04.2019 of CIT (A)-Tirupati for A.Ys.2011-12 to 2015-16- Recalled matters due to opting for Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme- Assessment of income from liquor business for A.Y 2011-12- Addition of interest income from sundry debtors- Estimation of profit from liquor business- Validity of order passed u/s 153C- Challenge to estimation of profit at 5% on liquor business for A.Ys 2012-13 to 2014-15Detailed Analysis:1. The appeals were filed against orders of CIT (A)-Tirupati for A.Ys.2011-12 to 2015-16, which were heard together due to common issues. The Tribunal recalled its earlier dismissal of the appeals as the assessee opted for Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, making these recalled matters.2. The primary issue pertained to the assessment of income from the liquor business for A.Y 2011-12. The Assessing Officer made additions to the total income, including interest income from sundry debtors and an adjustment in net profit percentage. The CIT (A) partially allowed the appeal, leading to the assessee's appeal before the Tribunal.3. The first issue was the addition of interest income from sundry debtors. The Assessing Officer added Rs.1,17,200 as interest income, but the Tribunal found this addition unjustified as it was based on presumptions without concrete evidence. Hence, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal on this issue.4. The second issue was the estimation of profit from the liquor business. The Assessing Officer estimated profit at 8% of turnover due to lack of maintained books of accounts. The CIT (A) restricted it to 5% based on the assessee's request. The Tribunal upheld the CIT (A)'s decision, considering the circumstances and the absence of proper records.5. The validity of the order passed u/s 153C was challenged, but the additional ground raised by the assessee was dismissed as not pressed, indicating no further challenge on this issue.6. For A.Ys 2012-13 to 2014-15, similar issues of interest income from sundry debtors and profit estimation in the liquor business were raised. The Tribunal allowed the appeals based on the decision made for A.Y 2011-12, finding the grounds raised by the assessee justified.7. In conclusion, the Tribunal partly allowed all 5 appeals filed by the assessee, addressing the issues of interest income from sundry debtors and the estimation of profit from the liquor business across multiple assessment years. The order was pronounced on 6th January 2023.
TaxTMI 