Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to refund of excess excise duty paid on texturised yarn on the basis of the exemption notification applicable to yarn of the relevant denier count.
Analysis: The duty payable depended on the denier count of the polyester yarn. The relevant exemption notification provided a lower rate for yarn of 100 deniers and above but not above 750 deniers, while the petitioners had paid duty at the higher rate applicable to yarn of 75 deniers and above but below 100 deniers. The Court accepted that the excess collected for the relevant period was liable to be refunded. The claim relating to additional excise duty and special duty of excise was not sustained, and the issue concerning the effect of later legislation was left for determination by the Department.
Conclusion: The petitioners were held entitled to refund of the excess basic excise duty shown in Exhibit G, while the larger refund claim shown in Exhibit F was rejected.