Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 constituted invocation of the appellant's personal guarantee so as to sustain an application under section 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The notice was issued in the context of enforcement of security interest against the mortgaged property. The record showed that no independent steps had been taken by the creditor to proceed against the appellant as guarantor for recovery of dues. The statutory scheme of section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 was treated as a mechanism for enforcing security interest, and the materials placed before the Tribunal did not establish that the guarantee itself had been invoked. The report of the Resolution Professional also noted that no subsequent notice had been issued to the personal guarantor and adverted to limitation considerations.
Conclusion: The notice under section 13(2) did not constitute sufficient invocation of the appellant's guarantee, and the application under section 94 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was not admissible.