GST Exemption Triumph: Taxpayer Wins Challenge Against First Appellate Authority's Order on E-Way Bill Compliance

HC allowed writ petition challenging first appellate authority's order under GST Act. Court found no e-way bill requirement on 03.03.2018 per GST Council exemptions. Multiple batch numbers on transportation bags did not indicate undeclared goods. First appellate authority's order was set aside, directing refund of deposited amount within fifteen days.

---

---

Issues:
Assailing order passed by first appellate authority under Section 129 (3) of UPGST Act read with Section 20 of IGST Act - Necessity of e-way bill/TDS for goods in transit - Interpretation of batch numbers on bags used for transportation - Refund of deposited amount before first appellate authority.

Analysis:
The writ petition challenged the order of the first appellate authority dated 10.12.2021, concerning the transportation of goods by a private limited company registered under the Indian Companies Act. The petitioner's goods, being raw material transported from Kutch, Gujarat to Haridwar, Uttarakhand, were intercepted on 03.03.2018 at Muzaffarnagar. Despite compliance with Section 129 (1) (a) of the Act, the first appellate authority dismissed the petitioner's appeal.

Regarding the necessity of e-way bill/TDS, the petitioner argued that as per GST Council exemptions, there was no requirement for an e-way bill until 31.03.2018. The petitioner also explained the multiple uses of bags for transporting raw material, but the first appellate authority dismissed the appeal based on the presence of two batch numbers on the bags, indicating undeclared goods.

The Court referred to previous judgments, including M/S Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of U.P., establishing that the requirement of an e-way bill until 31.03.2018 was waived. Consequently, the first appellate authority's order mandating an e-way/TDS bill on 03.03.2018 was deemed invalid, and the order dated 10.12.2021 was set aside on that ground.

Regarding the batch numbers on the bags, the petitioner's explanation that the bags were reused multiple times for raw material transportation was found valid. The Court concluded that the first appellate authority's decision lacked merit, leading to the setting aside of the order in appeal No. GST-0037/2020.

The Court directed the refund of any amount deposited by the petitioner before the first appellate authority within fifteen days of producing a certified copy of the order. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, providing relief to the petitioner.

---