Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of registration was liable to be quashed because the show cause notice did not specify the date and time for personal hearing and was not in the prescribed format.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under Section 29(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 read with Rule 22(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 requires issuance of a show cause notice in the prescribed form and affording the person concerned an opportunity of being heard. The prescribed form contemplates advance intimation of the date and time of personal hearing. The notice issued in the present case omitted that essential detail. Such omission deprived the petitioner of the effective opportunity of hearing mandated by the rule and offended the principles of natural justice. Service through the common portal could not cure the defect in the notice itself.
Conclusion: The cancellation proceedings founded on the defective notice were illegal, void, and a nullity. The impugned cancellation order was quashed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed, and the revenue authorities were left at liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A cancellation of registration is unsustainable where the show cause notice, though issued under the GST framework, fails to comply with the prescribed form by omitting the date and time of personal hearing, thereby denying the statutorily required opportunity of hearing.