Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether the contract for construction of the new railway siding was a works contract; (ii) whether the work constituted original works; and (iii) whether the work pertained to railways so as to attract the concessional rate under the relevant entry.
Issue (i): whether the contract for construction of the new railway siding was a works contract.
Analysis: The scope of work involved construction activities of a permanent character, including formation work, bridges, drains, track linking, service buildings, electrification and installation of weigh bridge infrastructure. The definition of works contract under section 2(119) of the GST Act applies only where the contract is for building, construction or similar activities in relation to immovable property and involves transfer of property in goods in execution of the contract. The nature of the work, read with the site-specific and permanent components of the project, showed that it was connected with immovable property and involved supply of goods in execution.
Conclusion: The contract was held to be a works contract.
Issue (ii): whether the work constituted original works.
Analysis: The expression original works includes all new constructions. The project was for construction of a new railway siding and allied infrastructure, and not for repair, renovation or alteration of an existing structure. The work therefore fell within the statutory meaning of original works under the applicable notification.
Conclusion: The work was held to be original works.
Issue (iii): whether the work pertained to railways so as to attract the concessional rate under the relevant entry.
Analysis: The Authority treated railway sidings connected with railway operations as falling within the expression railway, and relied on the statutory definition in the Railways Act as well as the broader understanding of railway infrastructure for freight movement. The project was for a new railway siding at Jhanjra Area of ECL, and was therefore treated as work pertaining to railways. Once the supply was found to be a works contract and original works pertaining to railways, it answered the concessional entry under Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The later omission of the entry was also noted for the period after 18.07.2022.
Conclusion: The work was held to pertain to railways and to fall under the concessional rate entry until its omission.
Final Conclusion: The contract was treated as a taxable works contract eligible for the concessional 12% rate under the specified notification up to 17.07.2022, after which the omitted entry no longer applied.
Ratio Decidendi: A new railway siding project involving permanent civil and allied infrastructure is a works contract in relation to immovable property, qualifies as original works, and where the siding is part of railway infrastructure, falls within the concessional entry for works contract services pertaining to railways.