CESTAT: Retention charges of cylinders not part of assessable value for gas supply beyond period

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD held that retention charges of cylinders should not be included in the assessable value of gas supplied beyond the stipulated period. Relying on the Supreme Court's decision in Grasim Industries Ltd., the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, as the issue was no longer Res-Integra based on previous decisions.

---

---

Issues involved:
Whether retention charges of cylinders, where gas is supplied to the customer beyond the stipulated period, should be included in the assessable value of the gas.

Analysis:
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD, comprising HON'BLE MR. RAMESH NAIR, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) and HON'BLE MR. RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL), addressed the issue of whether retention charges of cylinders should be included in the assessable value of gas supplied beyond the stipulated period. The appellant's counsel cited a previous order in favor of the assessee in a similar case. The Revenue representative acknowledged the department's acceptance of the Tribunal's earlier order. The Tribunal examined the issue in light of previous judgments, including the Supreme Court's decision in Grasim Industries Ltd. The Tribunal concluded that retention charges are not part of the sale price and should not be included in the transaction value of the gas sold in cylinders. Relying on the precedent set by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal.

In summary, the Tribunal found that the issue was no longer Res-Integra based on the previous decisions and the Supreme Court's judgment in Grasim Industries Ltd. Therefore, the impugned order was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed.

---