2022 (12) TMI 1329 - HC - VAT and Sales Tax

Court invalidates respondent's communication, relieves petitioner from entry tax obligation on denatured spirit.

Shree Renuka Sugars Ltd. Versus The State Of Karnataka, The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Bangalore, The Additional Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes, (Legal And Policy) Bangalore

The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, invalidating the communication from respondent No.2 and relieving the petitioner from the obligation to pay ... Classification of goods - rate of GST - denatured Anhydrous alcohol is a kind of Ethyl alcohol or not - HELD THAT:- Section 3 of the KTEG Act deals with levy of tax and it specifies that “tax shall be levied and collected on the entry of any goods specified in the First Schedule into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein at such rates not exceeding 5% of the value of the goods as may be specified retrospectively or prospectively by the State Government by Notification, and different dates and different rates may be specified in respect of different goods or different classes of goods of different local areas”. In other words, the tax can be levied only by issuing a notification and not otherwise. The notification dated 30.04.1992 issued by the Government of Karnataka in exercise of powers conferred under section 3(1) of KTEG Act, tax was levied at the rate of 2% on denatured spirit, rectified spirit and ethyl alcohol. The notification dated 31.03.1997 provided for levy tax on denatured spirit at the rate of 4%. Thereafter, a notification dated 15.02.2001 was issued exempting payment of tax on denatured spirit and also in the subsequent notification dated 30.03.2002. These notifications are not disputed by the State Government which provides for exemption from payment of tax on denatured spirit under notification dated 30.03.2002 issued in exercise of powers under section 3(1) of the KTEG Act. The levy of tax on denatured spirit have been omitted and the petitioner is not liable to pay tax for the period 2007-08 and 2008-09 and levy or payment of tax on denatured spirit is exempted. The levy of tax is for the period 2007-08 and 2008-09 and for the said period, there was no notification issued under section 3(1) of the KTEG Act levying entry tax on the denatured spirit. Hence, the petitioner is not entitled to pay the entry tax on the denatured spirit for having purchased, manufactured or supplied it to the various petroleum companies for the said period. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the clarification dated 10.02.2009 issued by the respondent No.2 at Annexure-C is hereby quashed. Petition disposed off. Issues:Challenge to communication taxing denatured Anhydrous alcohol at 4% under KTEG Act - Differentiation between denatured spirit and ethyl alcohol - Validity of notification imposing tax on denatured spirit - Interpretation of Entry 86 of First Schedule of KTEG Act.Analysis:The petitioner contested a communication by respondent No.2 taxing denatured Anhydrous alcohol at 4% under the Karnataka Tax on Entry of Goods Act, 1979 (KTEG Act). The petitioner, a dealer of denatured Anhydrous Ethyl Alcohol, argued that denatured spirit and ethyl alcohol are distinct components under Entry 86 of the First Schedule of the KTEG Act. The absence of a notification levying tax on denatured spirit for the relevant period was highlighted as impermissible and lacking legal authority.The respondent, however, asserted that denatured Anhydrous alcohol is ethyl alcohol, justifying the entry tax under a notification issued pursuant to the KTEG Act. The purpose of the levy, regulating goods' entry for local consumption, was emphasized, distinguishing it from excise or value-added tax. Legal precedents, including the decision in M/s. OCL India Limited v. State of Orissa, were cited to support this position. The State's discretion in imposing taxes without demonstrating direct benefit to traders or manufacturers, as established in Jindal Stainless Ltd v. State Of Haryana, was also referenced.Upon review, the Court examined Section 3 of the KTEG Act, emphasizing that tax imposition requires a formal notification. Historical notifications dating back to 1992, 1997, and 2001 were discussed, with exemptions granted for denatured spirit in subsequent notifications, including one in 2002. The Court noted that the petitioner was not liable for tax during 2007-08 and 2008-09 due to the exemption on denatured spirit.The Court determined that the denatured spirit and ethyl alcohol are distinct products, not interchangeable, as per Entry 86 of the First Schedule of the KTEG Act. Consequently, the clarification by respondent No.2, equating denatured spirit with ethyl alcohol, was deemed inconsistent with the Act's provisions. The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, invalidating the communication from respondent No.2 and relieving the petitioner from the obligation to pay entry tax on denatured spirit for the specified period. Subsequently, pending applications were disposed of in light of the judgment.