Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Miscellaneous Application seeking recall of the final order, on the basis of documents said to relate to the preceding financial year and the claimed SSI exemption, was maintainable.
Analysis: The application was founded on documents allegedly produced after the final order had already been dictated and pronounced in open court. The documents had not been placed before the adjudicating authorities below, and the record showed repeated non-production of the relevant material despite opportunities. The Tribunal held that a document not on record at the time of dictation could not be introduced for recalling the final order. It further held that there is no provision enabling the Tribunal to recall its own order and that the plea could not be treated as rectification of an error apparent on the record.
Conclusion: The recall application was not maintainable and was rejected.