Remand for fresh adjudication where imported goods matched earlier similar goods from the same supplier.

Imported goods were found to be materially similar to those covered in an earlier adjudication involving the same supplier, so the Tribunal held that the matter required fresh consideration by the adjudicating authority rather than final determination at that stage. The impugned orders were set aside and the dispute was remanded for a fresh order, leaving the substantive questions on exemption and classification open.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned orders were liable to be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication in view of the earlier order concerning identical goods and the same supplier.

Analysis: The goods imported in the present bill of entry were found to be materially similar to those involved in the earlier adjudication order. In view of that development, the matter required re-consideration by the adjudicating authority rather than a final determination at this stage.

Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for passing a fresh order.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was sent back for reconsideration, with the substantive questions on exemption and classification left open.

---