Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation and whether the recovery certificate issued by the Debt Recovery Tribunal gave rise to a fresh period of limitation.
Analysis: Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 governs an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and limitation ordinarily runs from the date when the right to apply accrues. The earlier view that a mortgaged debt could be treated as recoverable for twelve years under Article 62 was held inapplicable to a Section 7 application. However, the later judgment and recovery certificate of the Debt Recovery Tribunal constituted a fresh cause of action for initiating insolvency proceedings, and the application filed after that certificate was within limitation.
Conclusion: The limitation objection failed, and the application under Section 7 was not time-barred.
Ratio Decidendi: A recovery certificate or final adjudication by the Debt Recovery Tribunal can give rise to a fresh cause of action for a Section 7 insolvency application, which remains governed by Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963.