TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands case for fresh assessment to determine exemption eligibility under section 10(23C)(iiiab)</h1> <h3>Sir Vithaldas Thackersey College Of Home Science (Autonomous) Mumbai Versus. Income Tax Officer- 25 (3) (4) Mumbai</h3> Sir Vithaldas Thackersey College Of Home Science (Autonomous) Mumbai Versus. Income Tax Officer- 25 (3) (4) Mumbai - TMI Issues:1. Delay in filing appeal by the assessee.2. Assessment of income tax exemption under sections 10(23C)(iiiad), 11, and 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.3. Classification of the assessee as a Body of Individuals (BOI) for tax purposes.4. Validity of the assessee's independent status and filing of returns.Issue 1: Delay in filing appealThe appeal in ITA No. 4975/Mum/2019 for A.Y. 2014-15 was delayed by 2 days, and the assessee filed a petition for condonation of delay. The delay was condoned, and the appeal was admitted for adjudication.Issue 2: Assessment of income tax exemptionThe assessee, an educational institution under SNDT Women's University, claimed exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act. The Income Tax Officer treated the assessee as a BOI and denied the exemption. The CIT(A) upheld this assessment, stating that the exemption was not claimed by the assessee and that it was not entitled to exemptions under sections 11 and 12 as an independent entity.Issue 3: Classification as a Body of IndividualsThe AO treated the assessee as a BOI, separate from SNDT Women's University, rejecting the plea that the assessee was only a constituent of the university. The CIT(A) upheld this classification, leading to the taxation of the entire income of the assessee.Issue 4: Validity of independent statusThe affidavits filed by the Principal and Registrar of the assessee's college clarified that it is part of SNDT Women's University and does not have independent status. The PAN obtained independently was deemed erroneous, and the financial affairs were merged with the university from AY 2015-16 onwards. The Tribunal remanded the case to the AO for fresh assessment, allowing the assessee to make a fresh claim for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) based on being wholly and substantially financed by the government.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, remanding the case for fresh assessment to determine the eligibility for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) and clarifying the incorrect independent status of the assessee as a constituent of SNDT Women's University.
TaxTMI 