Penalties upheld for facilitating fraudulent Cenvat Credit; Appellants involved in passing credit to M./s Archon

The penalties imposed under Rule 26(2)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 on appellants for facilitating fraudulent availment of Cenvat Credit by M./s Archon were upheld. The Member (Judicial) found no infirmity in the impugned order and dismissed the appeals, affirming the penalties for all appellants based on their involvement in the fraudulent passing of credit to M./s Archon.

---

---

Issues:
Imposition of penalty under Rule 26(2)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 for facilitating fraudulent availment of Cenvat Credit to M./s Archon.

Analysis:
The appeals were filed against the order imposing penalties under Rule 26(2)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 2002, alleging that the appellants facilitated the fraudulent availment of Cenvat Credit by M./s Archon. Despite multiple listing dates with no appearance from the appellant, the appeals were taken up for disposal. The Assistant Commissioner representing the revenue reiterated the findings of the impugned order and cited a previous tribunal decision upholding penalties against similarly placed appellants. The Member (Judicial) carefully considered the submissions and records, noting that penalties were imposed on all appellants for facilitating fraudulent passing of credit to M./s Archon. The Adjudicating Authority's findings for each appellant were reviewed:

- Balalji Logistic: Penalty imposed for providing blank LR facilitating M./s Archon to avail Cenvat credit on the strength of fraudulent invoices from M/s Accord.
- Topline Switchgear P Ltd: Invoices issued without dispatch documents, confirmed by statements admitting paper transactions to wrongly facilitate Cenvat Credit for M./s Archon.
- Ridhhi Steel: Invoices showed clearance of goods to M./s Archon without actual supply, with discrepancies in transport documents and missing test reports, indicating fraudulent Cenvat credit availing.

The Member (Judicial) found no infirmity in the impugned order, upholding penalties under Rule 26(2)(i) for all appellants based on their facilitation of fraudulent Cenvat credit availment by M./s Archon. Consequently, the penalties were upheld, and the appeals were dismissed. The judgment was pronounced in open court on 01.12.2022.

---