GST Registration Cancelled: Missed Appeal Deadline Invalidates Challenge Despite COVID-19 Limitation Extensions for Statutory Proceedings

HC dismissed writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation. Despite COVID-19 related limitation extension, petitioner failed to file statutory appeal within prescribed timeline. Court found no procedural irregularities in cancellation order and suggested petitioner could reapply for GST registration, effectively upholding the original cancellation decision.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to order cancelling GST registration - Invocation of Certiorari and Mandamus - Calculation of limitation period for filing statutory appeal.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to a writ petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration of a Manpower Agency. The petitioner sought relief through Certiorari to quash the impugned order and Mandamus to direct the respondents to revoke the registration cancellation. The court noted discrepancies in the cause title but identified the petitioner as the sole proprietor of the business. The core issue revolved around the timeline of events leading to the cancellation of registration and subsequent dismissal of the statutory appeal.

The writ petitioner's GST registration was cancelled due to non-filing of returns, prompting the petitioner to pursue remedies under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The statutory appeal against the cancellation was dismissed by the Appellate Authority on grounds of limitation. The court delved into the statutory provisions under Section 107 of the TN-GST Act, which prescribe a three-month limitation period from the date of communication of the order, extendable by one month. The computation of dates was guided by the Dodds Vs. Walker principle, aligning with the last day of the succeeding English calendar month.

In analyzing the limitation period, the court considered the impact of the COVID-19 situation, referencing a Supreme Court order extending the limitation period until 28.02.2022. Despite the extension, the petitioner failed to file the appeal within the revised timeline, rendering the order non-enforceable in their favor. Consequently, the court found no grounds to interfere with the impugned order, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.

As a concluding remark, the court informed the petitioner of the option to reapply for GST registration, ensuring a prompt consideration of the application within legal parameters. The judgment culminated in the dismissal of the writ petition without any cost implications.

---