TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Allows Revenue's Appeal on Share Deletion Under Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>DCIT, Circle-25 (2), New Delhi. Versus TPS Infrastructure Ltd.</h3> DCIT, Circle-25 (2), New Delhi. Versus TPS Infrastructure Ltd. - TMI Issues:1. Addition under Section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Treatment of buy back of own shares as 'property' under Section 56(2)(viia).3. Exemption from Section 56(2)(viia) due to buy back and cancellation under Company Act.Analysis:1. The Revenue challenged the deletion of an addition of Rs.5,62,93,450 made by the AO under Section 56(2)(viia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Revenue argued that the buy back of shares should be considered as 'property' under this provision. The First Appellate Authority was criticized for granting relief to the assessee without considering the conditions of Section 56(2)(viia).2. The Assessee contended that the buy back of its own shares did not meet the criteria of 'property' under Section 56(2)(viia). The Assessee relied on a similar case decided by the ITAT Mumbai in favor of the assessee. The Assessee argued that the shares were extinguished by reducing the capital, making them different from shares of another company.3. The ITAT analyzed the provisions of Section 56(2)(viia) and the related memorandum to determine that the provision applies when a firm or company receives shares from another company. It was established that the shares must become the property of the recipient, and in this case, they should be shares of another company, not the buyer's own shares. The ITAT concluded that the provision should only apply when purchased shares become the property of the buyer company, and if they are shares of another company. The case was remanded to the AO to verify the extinguishment of shares by reducing the paid-up capital of the assessee.In conclusion, the appeal filed by the Revenue was allowed for the limited purpose of verifying the extinguishment of shares by reducing the paid-up capital. The decision was based on the interpretation of Section 56(2)(viia) and the specific circumstances of the case, aligning with the findings of a similar case decided by the ITAT Mumbai.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
