Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal sets aside tax orders, clarifies TDS on CAM charges.</h1> <h3>BIBA Apparels Private Ltd. Versus ACIT (TDS), Circle-73 (1), New Delhi.</h3> BIBA Apparels Private Ltd. Versus ACIT (TDS), Circle-73 (1), New Delhi. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Assessee-in-default status for short-deduction of taxes under section 201(1) / 201(1A) of the Act.2. Validity of the notice dated March 5, 2018, regarding its limitation period.3. Correct tax deduction rate applicable for Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges.4. Imposition of interest under section 201(1A) of the Act.5. Applicability of the first proviso to section 201(1) of the Act regarding the assessee-in-default status.6. Consideration of taxes paid by deductees on CAM charges in relation to interest charged under section 201(1A).Detailed Analysis:1. Assessee-in-default Status for Short-deduction of Taxes:The assessee was held as an 'assessee-in-default' by the TDS Officer for the alleged short-deduction of taxes amounting to INR 886,587 for AY 2011-12 and INR 14,29,910 for AY 2012-13 under section 201(1) / 201(1A) of the Act. The CIT(A) upheld this action. The Tribunal, however, found that the CAM charges are completely independent and separate from rental payments and are fundamentally for availing common area maintenance services. Therefore, the CAM charges should be subjected to deduction of tax at source under section 194C of the Act at 2%, not under section 194-I at 10%.2. Validity of Notice Dated March 5, 2018:The assessee contended that the notice dated March 5, 2018, was barred by limitation and void ab-initio, and thus the order passed under section 201(1) / 201(1A) on March 29, 2018, should be quashed. However, the Tribunal did not specifically address the issue of limitation in its final judgment, focusing instead on the applicability of the correct TDS rate for CAM charges.3. Correct Tax Deduction Rate for CAM Charges:The Tribunal examined the nature of CAM charges and concluded that they are not part of the rent but are payments made for maintenance services. The Tribunal referred to various judgments, including the case of Kapoor Watch Company Pvt. Ltd. and Connaught Plaza Restaurants P. Ltd., to establish that CAM charges fall under the purview of section 194C of the Act, which mandates a 2% TDS rate. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled that the assessee correctly deducted TDS at 2% for CAM charges.4. Imposition of Interest under Section 201(1A):The CIT(A) affirmed the imposition of interest amounting to INR 417,380 for AY 2011-12 and INR 6,74,946 for AY 2012-13 under section 201(1A) of the Act. The Tribunal, however, set aside this imposition, holding that the assessee was not liable for higher TDS under section 194-I, and thus, the interest charged was unwarranted.5. Applicability of First Proviso to Section 201(1):The assessee argued that it should not be treated as an 'assessee-in-default' in view of the first proviso to section 201(1) of the Act. The Tribunal did not specifically address this argument, as it had already concluded that the assessee correctly deducted TDS under section 194C, thereby nullifying the 'assessee-in-default' status.6. Taxes Paid by Deductees on CAM Charges:The assessee contended that the deductees had paid taxes on the CAM charges received, and thus, the interest charged under section 201(1A) should be deleted. The Tribunal agreed, referencing the decision of the Apex Court in Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages vs CIT, which supports the view that if the deductees have paid taxes, the payer should not be treated as an 'assessee-in-default' for short-deduction of TDS.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, setting aside the orders of the CIT(A) and the AO. It directed the deletion of the impugned liability under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act, affirming that the CAM charges should be subjected to TDS under section 194C at 2%, not section 194-I at 10%. The judgment underscores the importance of correctly categorizing payments for TDS purposes and provides clarity on the treatment of CAM charges.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found