Tribunal Adjusts Tax Deductions & Interest Charges

The Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, directing the correct application of provisions for deduction under section 80HHC and interest charged under section 234B of the Act. The Tribunal instructed the Assessing Officer to reduce 90% of net interest received for calculating the deduction under section 80HHC. Regarding interest charged under section 234B, the Tribunal held that interest should have been charged up to December 2006, not March 2007, and noted a calculation error in the interest charged in different assessment orders, referring the matter back to the Assessing Officer for verification.

---

---

Issues:
1. Deduction u/s 80HHC of the Act - Interest paid on security deposit not allowed for netting purpose.
2. Correctness of interest charged u/s 234B of the Act - Cut-off date for charging interest and application of relevant sections.

Analysis:

Deduction u/s 80HHC of the Act:
The assessee, engaged in manufacturing pharmaceutical products, claimed deduction u/s 80HHC. The Assessing Officer disallowed interest paid on security deposit for netting purpose, stating lack of direct nexus with interest bearing assets. The ld. CIT(A) upheld this decision. The Tribunal, citing judgments by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, directed the Assessing Officer to reduce 90% of net interest received for calculating deduction u/s 80HHC, allowing the appeal.

Correctness of interest charged u/s 234B of the Act:
The dispute arose regarding the cut-off date for charging interest u/s 234B. The Assessing Officer charged interest up to March 2007, post-completion of regular assessment in December 2006. The ld. CIT(A) relied on Section 234B(3) instead of Section 234B(4), which was applicable. The Tribunal reversed this decision, stating that interest should have been charged up to December 2006. Additionally, a calculation error was noted in the interest charged in different assessment orders, leading to the matter being referred back to the Assessing Officer for verification.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal partially, directing correct application of provisions for deduction u/s 80HHC and interest charged u/s 234B. The delay in pronouncing the order was acknowledged, attributing it to unavoidable circumstances.

---