TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Notification No. 05/2019-Cus. dated 16.02.2019 could be applied to goods and import transactions that had already entered India and for which checklist Bill of Entry had been filed before the notification was issued; and whether the petitioner was entitled to assessment and clearance on the duty applicable at the time of filing of the Bill of Entry.
Issue (i): Whether Notification No. 05/2019-Cus. dated 16.02.2019 could be applied to goods and import transactions that had already entered India and for which checklist Bill of Entry had been filed before the notification was issued.
Analysis: The imported goods had entered India before the notification was issued and uploaded at 8.45 p.m. on 16.02.2019. The petitioner's import orders were placed prior to that date, the goods had been received in India before issuance of the notification, and the checklist Bill of Entry had already been filed. In these circumstances, applying the enhanced duty notification would amount to retrospective operation, which is impermissible.
Conclusion: The notification could not be applied retrospectively to the petitioner's import.
Issue (ii): Whether the petitioner was entitled to assessment and clearance on the duty applicable at the time of filing of the Bill of Entry.
Analysis: Once the goods had entered India before issuance of the notification and the checklist Bill of Entry had been filed, generation of the Bill of Entry was treated as a procedural consequence. The relevant duty was therefore the duty applicable when the Bill of Entry was filed and assessed, and the enhanced notification could not override that position.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to assessment and clearance on the duty applicable at the time of filing of the Bill of Entry.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, and the petitioner obtained relief consistent with the earlier binding decision on identical facts, with the impugned enhanced duty notification not governing the import in question.
Ratio Decidendi: A fiscal notification enhancing duty cannot be applied retrospectively to imports that have already entered India before its issuance, and the operative duty is the duty applicable when the Bill of Entry is filed and assessed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
