Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether electricity connection could be restored without insisting on security deposit. (ii) Whether the electricity distribution company could insist on payment of past dues after approval of the resolution plan.
Issue (i): Whether electricity connection could be restored without insisting on security deposit.
Analysis: Security deposit was treated as a pre-condition for sanction of a high-tension power connection. The requirement was linked to securing payment of electricity dues and could not be dispensed with for restoration of supply to a heavy industry requiring substantial power.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the appellant and restoration without security deposit was not permitted.
Issue (ii): Whether the electricity distribution company could insist on payment of past dues after approval of the resolution plan.
Analysis: Once the resolution plan was approved, past claims stood extinguished. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code had overriding effect under Section 238, and inconsistent electricity supply regulations could not be enforced so as to defeat the approved resolution plan. The claim raised after approval was therefore not maintainable.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the respondent and insistence on past dues was not permitted.
Final Conclusion: Both appeals failed. The order partly allowing relief on past dues and refusing restoration without security deposit was sustained in substance, and the applications stood finally concluded.
Ratio Decidendi: An approved resolution plan prevails over inconsistent statutory or regulatory claims by virtue of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code's overriding effect, and a distribution licensee cannot insist on extinguished past dues to defeat implementation of the plan; security deposit requirements for supply restoration remain enforceable unless lawfully waived.