Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit could be denied on air travel agency services, works contract services, and construction services used by the appellant.
Analysis: The disallowance on air travel services was not supported by any material showing personal use or employee consumption, and business-related travel debited in the books could not be treated as non-business expenditure without proper basis. The denial under works contract service was unsustainable because the reverse charge notification relied upon applied to individuals, partnership firms and HUFs, not to a private limited company, and the valuation/abatement notification cited was also inapplicable to the facts. The disallowance relating to construction service was set aside because the appellate authority travelled beyond the scope of the show-cause notice and the original order by introducing a new basis not raised earlier.
Conclusion: The credit disallowances on all the disputed services were not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appellant was granted the consequential relief available in law.
Ratio Decidendi: Cenvat credit cannot be denied on a conjectural basis without supporting material, and a demand cannot be sustained on grounds that fall outside the show-cause notice; exemption or reverse-charge notifications must apply to the assessee on their terms before credit can be disallowed.