Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fees collected by the respondent for carrying out functions mandated under the Energy Conservation Act and the regulations framed thereunder were liable to service tax under the category of technical inspection and certification service.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the same issue had already been decided in the respondent's favour for an earlier period. It accepted that the fees were collected in discharge of statutory obligations under the governing enactment and regulations, that the amounts were pre-notified and fixed by authority, and that the activity was not a voluntary commercial service. Fees collected for statutory performance, in these circumstances, could not be subjected to service tax.
Conclusion: The fees collected for statutory performance were not exigible to service tax, and the challenge to the dropping of proceedings failed.