Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tin containers manufactured from printed and lacquered sheets were manufactured with the aid of power so as to disentitle the assessee from exemption under Notification No. 94/70 dated May 1, 1970.
Analysis: Metal containers falling under Item 46 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 were intended for packing goods and the assessee supplied containers made to the buyer's specification. The sheets used for the containers were printed and lacquered by another concern with the aid of power, and that stage formed part of the manufacture of the containers. Applying the settled test that processing requires some change in the commodity, the Court held that the sheets underwent a physical and visible change and that the use of power in that process was material. Since the notification denied exemption where no process in or in relation to manufacture was ordinarily carried on with the aid of power, the assessee could not claim the benefit.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available and the demand and penalty were sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a material undergoes a change in an intermediate stage of manufacture and that stage is carried on with the aid of power, the resulting goods are treated as manufactured with the aid of power for the purpose of a power-based exemption notification.