Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether arrears of tax due from a company could be recovered from a former director by attachment of his properties under the revenue recovery provisions, and whether amalgamation of the company could be treated as equivalent to winding up so as to attract director liability.
Analysis: Recovery of a company's tax dues from its directors is permissible only within the statutory framework that authorises such recovery when the company is in liquidation. An amalgamation under the Companies Act operates by transfer of assets and liabilities to the transferee company and is legally different from winding up. The winding up procedure is governed separately under the Companies Act and cannot be equated with amalgamation merely because the transferor company ceases to exist in its original form. On that footing, the attachment issued under the revenue recovery proceedings against a former director for company arrears was not legally sustainable.
Conclusion: The challenge to the attachment succeeded, and the recovery action against the petitioner was held unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: Company tax arrears could not be recovered from the petitioner's properties on the basis adopted by the revenue authority, and the impugned attachment was set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Director liability for recovery of company tax dues arises only when the statute so permits, and amalgamation is not the same as winding up or liquidation for the purpose of enforcing such recovery.