GST Registration Revocation Overturned: Petitioner Granted Relief by Reinstating Registration After Compliance with Return and Tax Obligations

HC allowed the writ petition challenging GST registration cancellation due to non-filing of returns. Following precedent in a similar case, the court granted relief by establishing conditions for revocation, including filing past returns, paying defaulted taxes with interest, and adhering to Input Tax Credit guidelines. The decision was made without imposing costs, consistent with previous judicial interpretations of GST compliance requirements.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to cancellation of Registration Certificate due to failure to file GST returns for six months.

Analysis:
The Writ Petition challenged the cancellation of the Registration Certificate based on the Petitioner's failure to file Goods and Services Tax monthly returns for a continuous period of six months. The cancellation was done under Section 29 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, effective from 31.12.2021. The Petitioner explained that the non-filing of returns was due to health issues. Despite this, the GST Registration was cancelled, and the Petitioner couldn't file for revocation in time.

In a similar case, the Court issued specific directions in the case of Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece, providing conditions for revocation. These conditions included filing returns for the period before cancellation, paying any tax defaulted with interest, fines, and fees, and not using any unutilized Input Tax Credit for payments. The Court also directed that any Input Tax Credit should be approved by the Department before utilization. The Petitioners were required to pay GST in cash for subsequent periods and follow strict guidelines to prevent misuse of Input Tax Credit.

Given the consistent application of the directions in previous cases, the Court decided to extend the same benefits to the Petitioner in this case. The judgment ordered the Writ Petition to be allowed on the terms mentioned in the earlier case of Suguna Cutpiece Centre, with no costs imposed. The decision was based on the established precedent and the acceptance of this view by the Revenue/Department, as evidenced by the absence of appeals in similar matters.

In conclusion, the Court relied on past judgments and established guidelines to provide relief to the Petitioner in challenging the cancellation of their Registration Certificate due to non-filing of GST returns. The decision was made in line with previous directions issued by the Court to ensure compliance with tax regulations and prevent misuse of Input Tax Credit.

---