Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal remands service tax case for reconsideration due to improper exemption claim handling</h1> The Tribunal remanded the case involving service tax liabilities on various construction projects for reconsideration, noting that the lower adjudicating ... Exemption from Service tax - works contract service - Commercial or Industrial Construction Service - Construction of Complex Service - site formation and clearance, excavation, earth moving & demolition services - construction work carried out for M/s Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. - construction work of laying of drainage/sewerage pipelines and related work carried out for Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) under the works contract service - construction of commercial complex consisting shops at Jasdan Bus Terminus carried out for Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Ltd. (GSRTC) - construction of residential complexes carried out for Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation Ltd. - construction work carried out for Navsari Agricultural University - work carried out for M/s Sabarmati River Front Development Corporation Ltd. - principles of natural justice. HELD THAT:- As regard the service provided to Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. it is found that such services are exempted from payment of service tax in terms of Notification No. 45/2010 –ST dated 20.07.2010. The decisions relied upon by the Appellant in this context also support the claim of appellant, however we do not find any finding on this aspect in impugned order. Similarly from the definition of “commercial or industrial construction service” defined in Section 65(25b) it is found that the said definition exclude the services provided in respect of road and transport terminals. The definition of residential complex as defined in Section 65(91a) of Finance Act 1994 also does not include a complex which is intended for personal use as residence, the explanation clause of said definition also defined personal use includes permitting the complex for use as residence by another person on rent or without consideration. The Notification No. 17/2005 –S.T. dated 07.06.2005 exempts Site Formation and clearance, excavation and demolition and such other similar activities carried out in the course of construction of roads, Airports, Railways, terminal, bridges, tunnels, dams, ports or other ports etc. from the levy of service tax. In respect of other services also appellant claim the service tax exemption. In support of their arguments appellant also produced work orders issued by Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation Ltd., Navsari Agricultural University, Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation and Sabarmati River Front Development Corporation Ltd. - in the impugned matter the as regard the exemptions appellant also not produced their claim properly before the adjudicating authority with supporting documents. It is seen that the Ld. Commissioner has also not examined the claim of appellant properly, therefore, we find it appropriate to remand the matter to the Commissioner to examine this issue afresh, after taking into consideration the documents/ details /contracts /agreements and judgments relied upon by the appellant in support of service tax exemption. The lower adjudicating authority has not considered all the issues in the light of the legal authorities and judicial pronouncements while deciding the issue - case remanded back to the adjudicating authority for consideration of all the issues and thereafter to pass an order afresh after giving reasonable opportunity to the appellant of being heard - appeal allowed by way of remand. Issues Involved:1. Service tax liability on construction work for Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd.2. Service tax liability on construction of drainage/sewerage pipelines for Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation.3. Service tax liability on construction of commercial complex at Jasdan Bus Terminus for Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Ltd.4. Service tax liability on construction of residential complexes for Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation Ltd. and Navsari Agricultural University.5. Service tax liability on site formation and clearance, excavation, earth moving & demolition services for Sabarmati River Front Development Corporation Ltd.Detailed Analysis:1. Service Tax on Construction Work for Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd.:The appellant argued that the construction work for Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd. (GETCO) is exempt from service tax under Notification No. 45/2010-ST dated 20.07.2010, which exempts services related to the distribution or transmission of electricity. The appellant relied on several judgments to support this claim. The Tribunal found merit in this argument but noted that the impugned order did not address this exemption. The matter was remanded for reconsideration with the direction to examine the exemption claim properly.2. Service Tax on Construction of Drainage/Sewerage Pipelines:The appellant contended that the construction of drainage/sewerage pipelines for Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority (AUDA) and Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation (AMC) is non-commercial and thus exempt from service tax under the works contract service category. The respondent argued that since AMC charges fees from users, the service is not sovereign or philanthropic and is liable for service tax. The Tribunal noted the appellant's claim and remanded the matter for a thorough examination of the exemption claim.3. Service Tax on Construction of Commercial Complex at Jasdan Bus Terminus:The appellant argued that the construction of the bus terminal for Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Ltd. (GSRTC) is not commercial in nature and is excluded from the definition of Commercial or Industrial Construction Services under Section 65(25b) of the Finance Act, 1994. They claimed that the proper classification should be under works contract services. The Tribunal found force in the appellant's argument and remanded the matter for reconsideration of the proper classification and exemption claims.4. Service Tax on Construction of Residential Complexes:The appellant argued that the construction of residential complexes for Gujarat State Police Housing Corporation Ltd. and Navsari Agricultural University is intended for personal use and thus exempt from service tax under the definition of residential complex in Section 65(91a) of the Finance Act, 1994. The respondent countered that these constructions are not for personal use but are handed over to respective departments or rented out. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument and remanded the matter for a detailed examination of the exemption claims.5. Service Tax on Site Formation and Clearance, Excavation, Earth Moving & Demolition Services:The appellant argued that the site formation and excavation services for Sabarmati River Front Development Corporation Ltd. are directly related to road construction and thus exempt from service tax under Notification No. 17/2005-ST dated 07.06.2005. The respondent maintained that the services fall under the taxable category of site formation and clearance. The Tribunal noted the appellant's claim and remanded the matter for a thorough examination of the exemption claim.Conclusion:The Tribunal found that the lower adjudicating authority did not properly consider the appellant's exemption claims and supporting documents. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh examination of all issues, considering the legal authorities and judicial pronouncements. The appeal was disposed of by way of remand, with directions to provide the appellant a reasonable opportunity to present their case.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found