Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (11) TMI 625 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Assessment Order, Emphasizes Conditions for Section 263, Allows Deductions The Tribunal found the original assessment order not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue, quashing the Principal Commissioner's revisionary order under ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Upholds Assessment Order, Emphasizes Conditions for Section 263, Allows Deductions

                          The Tribunal found the original assessment order not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue, quashing the Principal Commissioner's revisionary order under section 263. The Tribunal emphasized the Assessing Officer's discretion and the need for both conditions (erroneous and prejudicial) to invoke section 263. It held that 'on money' disclosed by the assessee was business income, not subject to section 115BBE, allowing deductions. Deductions for service tax paid and remuneration to partners were upheld as legitimate business expenses under sections 37 and 40(b). The assessee's appeal was allowed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Legality of the revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Applicability of section 115BBE for taxing 'on money' disclosed by the assessee.
                          3. Eligibility of deductions under sections 37 and 40(b) for service tax paid and remuneration to partners.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Legality of the Revisionary Order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act:
                          The assessee challenged the revisionary order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, which set aside the assessment order under section 143(3) for the assessment year 2015-16. The Pr. CIT found the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue, primarily due to the incorrect allowance of deductions claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted inquiries and applied his mind to the issues, making the original assessment order neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the revenue. Citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Malabar Industries Ltd. vs. CIT, the Tribunal emphasized that an order cannot be deemed prejudicial to the revenue simply because it results in a loss of revenue if the AO's view is a legally permissible one. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT's order, deeming it unsustainable in law.

                          2. Applicability of Section 115BBE for Taxing 'On Money' Disclosed by the Assessee:
                          The Pr. CIT held that the 'on money' disclosed by the assessee should be taxed under section 69A and that the provisions of section 115BBE, which disallow any deductions against such income, were applicable. However, the Tribunal found that the 'on money' was related to the assessee's business income from construction activities. The Tribunal referred to the Gujarat High Court's judgment in Suman Papers & Boards Ltd., which allowed deductions under Chapter VI-A for business income, including undisclosed income. The Tribunal concluded that since the 'on money' was business income, the provisions of section 115BBE were not applicable, and the AO's allowance of deductions was justified.

                          3. Eligibility of Deductions under Sections 37 and 40(b) for Service Tax Paid and Remuneration to Partners:
                          The assessee claimed deductions for service tax paid (Rs. 39,33,270) and remuneration to partners (Rs. 24,00,000) under sections 37 and 40(b), respectively. The Pr. CIT disallowed these deductions, citing section 115BBE. The Tribunal, however, upheld the assessee's claims, noting that the service tax and remuneration were legitimate business expenses. The Tribunal referenced the Gujarat High Court's decision in Mhaskar General Hospital, which supported the allowance of such deductions for business income. The Tribunal also noted that the AO had inquired into these deductions during the assessment proceedings and had taken a permissible view. Therefore, the Tribunal found no error in the AO's order and allowed the deductions.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the AO's original assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interest of the revenue. The Tribunal quashed the Pr. CIT's revisionary order under section 263, allowing the assessee's appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of AO's discretion in taking permissible views and the necessity of both conditions (erroneous and prejudicial) being met for invoking section 263.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found