Appeal outcome: Additions deleted, disallowances confirmed. Delay condoned. Genuine reasons accepted.

The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting additions under Section 68 and for membership fees, while confirming disallowances for ROC tax and car depreciation. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to genuine reasons provided. The undisclosed short-term capital gain addition was deleted as the AO's non-compliance was unjustified. The Tribunal upheld the genuineness of transactions under Section 68 and allowable business expenses for membership fees. The disallowance of ROC tax and car depreciation was confirmed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.
2. Addition of Rs. 7,25,000/- as unexplained credit under Section 68.
3. Addition of Rs. 1,58,300/- as undisclosed short-term capital gain.
4. Disallowance of ROC tax of Rs. 10,235/-.
5. Disallowance of membership fees of Rs. 1,50,000/-.
6. Disallowance of car depreciation of Rs. 1,23,522/-.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Condonation of Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appeal was filed with a delay of 384 days. The assessee provided reasons for the delay, including the serious illness of the Director's mother-in-law and the COVID-19 pandemic. Supporting documents were filed. The Tribunal found the reasons genuine and condoned the delay.

2. Addition of Rs. 7,25,000/- as Unexplained Credit under Section 68:
The assessee received Rs. 31,25,000/- during the year, of which Rs. 7,25,000/- was contributed by the Director, Shri Atul K. Shah. The assessee provided bank statements and other documents to prove the transaction's genuineness. The Tribunal found the transactions were carried out through proper bank channels and the accounts were audited under Section 44AB without any defects. Thus, the addition under Section 68 was deleted.

3. Addition of Rs. 1,58,300/- as Undisclosed Short-Term Capital Gain:
The assessee sold a shop for Rs. 6 Lakhs, but the registered sale deed showed a jantri value of Rs. 7,34,700/-. The AO added the difference as undisclosed STCG without referring the matter to the District Valuation Officer. The Tribunal found this non-compliance unjustified and deleted the addition.

4. Disallowance of ROC Tax of Rs. 10,235/-:
The disallowance was based on the judgments in Punjab Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. vs. CIT and Brookebond India Ltd. vs. CIT. The assessee did not controvert these judgments in their submission. The Tribunal confirmed the disallowance.

5. Disallowance of Membership Fees of Rs. 1,50,000/-:
The assessee claimed the membership fees paid to All India Gems & Jewellery Federation as business expenses. The Tribunal found the periodic payment of membership fees as allowable business expenses and deleted the disallowance.

6. Disallowance of Car Depreciation of Rs. 1,23,522/-:
The car was purchased in the name of Hemantkumar Amrutlal Patel and later transferred to the Director, Shri Atul K. Shah. The AO disallowed the depreciation, stating the car was not owned by the company during the relevant financial year. The Tribunal, in absence of any further submission from the assessee, confirmed the disallowance.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the additions under Section 68 and for the membership fees, while confirming the disallowances for ROC tax and car depreciation. The appeal was allowed in part.

---