Tribunal rules in favor of taxpayer, rejects unexplained cash credit addition under Income Tax Act The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the addition of Rs. 4,40,000 towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act was ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal rules in favor of taxpayer, rejects unexplained cash credit addition under Income Tax Act
The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the addition of Rs. 4,40,000 towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act was unsustainable. The Tribunal found that the amount deposited in the bank was part of agricultural income retained by the assessee from the previous year, and the assessee had sufficiently explained the source of the deposit. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order confirming the addition and deleted the amount from the assessment.
Issues: Confirmation of addition of Rs. 4,40,000 towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The appeal pertains to the confirmation of addition of Rs. 4,40,000 towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, who is the Managing Director of a company, filed the return of income for the assessment year 2010-11 admitting income of Rs. 13,78,240. The case was reopened, and during assessment proceedings, the Assessing Officer questioned the cash deposit of Rs. 4,40,000. The assessee explained that this amount was part of agricultural income retained in cash from the previous year and deposited in the bank. However, the Assessing Officer did not accept this explanation and made the addition under section 68 of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) upheld this addition.
Upon appeal to the Tribunal, the assessee did not appear for the hearing. The Tribunal proceeded to hear the ld. DR and examined the records. It was noted that the Assessing Officer and the ld. CIT(A) did not dispute the agricultural income of Rs. 13,49,730 from the previous assessment year. The Tribunal found that the amount of Rs. 4,40,000 deposited in the bank was part of the agricultural income retained by the assessee. The Tribunal held that the assessee had explained the source of the deposit, and the onus was discharged by disclosing the source. Therefore, the addition made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the ld. CIT(A) was deemed unsustainable. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order of the ld. CIT(A) and deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer.
In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, pronouncing the order on 19th October 2022 in Chennai.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
