Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported glass beads, glass chattons, snap fasteners and zip fasteners were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 29 of 1979 as goods used in the leather industry.
Analysis: The notification granted exemption only to goods specified in the table when used in the leather industry. The goods in question were not shown to be exclusively used as embellishments for footwear or in the leather industry. The record before the authority did not establish the necessary end-use, and the mere possibility of use as embellishments or fasteners was insufficient to attract the notification.
Conclusion: The exemption was not available and the rejection of the refund claim was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The petition challenging denial of refund failed, and the respondents were entitled to retain the amount already deposited.
Ratio Decidendi: Where exemption depends on goods being used in a specified industry, the claimant must show the requisite end-use; absent such proof, the benefit of the notification cannot be granted.