Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount of Rs. 70,00,000 disbursed to the corporate debtor constituted a financial debt and whether default was established so as to admit the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The disbursal of Rs. 70,00,000 was not in dispute, but the parties gave conflicting versions as to its character, one asserting it was a loan and the other asserting it was a long-term investment repayable after 10 years. The documents placed on record, including bank entries, balance sheets, cheque dishonour material, TDS-related material and alleged acknowledgements, were treated only as corroborative and were found insufficient to prove the existence of a written or otherwise established financial contract setting out the terms of repayment, interest and tenure. The burden lay on the financial creditor to establish a legally recoverable financial debt and corresponding default. In the absence of reliable proof that the transaction was a loan disbursed against time value of money, the dishonoured cheques and TDS deduction did not, by themselves, establish default of a financial debt.
Conclusion: The application under Section 7 was not maintainable on the facts proved, as the financial debt and default were not established.
Ratio Decidendi: For admission under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the financial creditor must prove both the existence of a financial debt and default, and mere disbursal of money or corroborative entries without proof of the contractual terms and the nature of the transaction is insufficient.