Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order and the accompanying show cause notice were liable to be quashed for want of particulars and denial of an effective opportunity to meet the allegations.
Analysis: The notice did not furnish the details of the alleged suppressed sales, incorrect recording, or incorrect claims and deductions. A bald notice that omits the material particulars necessary to answer the proposed demand does not afford a meaningful opportunity of defence. The subsequent disclosure of details at the personal hearing could not cure the foundational defect in the notice. The Court held that future notices must contain every detail required to enable an effective response and that adjudication orders must record reasons dealing with the assessee's contentions.
Conclusion: The show cause notice and the assessment order were quashed for violation of natural justice, and the matter was sent back for issuance of a fresh detailed notice and fresh adjudication.