Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2022 (11) TMI 204 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Second s.148 notice issued during pending reassessment invalid where AO failed to dispose objections and breached natural justice The HC held the second notice issued under s.148 during pendency of reassessment proceedings to be invalid, finding that no fresh notice may be issued ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Second s.148 notice issued during pending reassessment invalid where AO failed to dispose objections and breached natural justice

                          The HC held the second notice issued under s.148 during pendency of reassessment proceedings to be invalid, finding that no fresh notice may be issued while reassessment is subsisting. The court found the AO failed to dispose of the taxpayer's objections and violated principles of natural justice by supplying an adverse statement without affording a reasonable opportunity to respond. The impugned second s.148 notice and consequential notices dated 18 May 2022 and 23 May 2022 were quashed.




                          Issues:
                          1. Challenge to notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Year 2013-14.
                          2. Jurisdiction of Assessing Officers issuing reassessment notices.
                          3. Disposal of objections before passing assessment order.
                          4. Sharing of crucial information with the petitioner.
                          5. Violation of principles of natural justice.
                          6. Legal implications of issuing multiple reassessment notices.
                          7. Compliance with Supreme Court judgments on assessment proceedings.

                          Issue 1: Challenge to notice under Section 148:
                          The petitioner challenged the notice dated 15th May, 2020, issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2013-14, along with reasons for reopening and approval granted by Respondent No.2. The petitioner also contested the assessment order, demand notice, and penalty imposition proceedings initiated subsequently.

                          Issue 2: Jurisdiction of Assessing Officers:
                          The petitioner raised concerns regarding the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officers issuing reassessment notices. It was argued that two reassessment notices were served simultaneously by different Assessing Officers, leading to a dispute over the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer. The petitioner contended that the assessments were conducted without following proper jurisdictional protocols.

                          Issue 3: Disposal of objections:
                          The petitioner objected to the assessment order dated 30th March, 2022, highlighting that their objections raised in a letter dated 22nd July, 2021, were not addressed before passing the assessment order. This non-disposal of objections was argued to be in violation of legal precedents, specifically referencing the Supreme Court's ruling in M/S GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd case.

                          Issue 4: Sharing of crucial information:
                          The petitioner emphasized the importance of sharing relevant information, specifically mentioning the failure to provide a copy of a statement relied upon by the Assessing Officer before the conclusion of the personal hearing. The petitioner raised concerns about the timing and manner in which the information was shared, alleging procedural irregularities.

                          Issue 5: Violation of principles of natural justice:
                          The petitioner contended that there was a violation of principles of natural justice as they were not given a reasonable opportunity to respond to crucial information shared by the Assessing Officer. The lack of a fair opportunity to address the shared statement was highlighted as a breach of procedural fairness.

                          Issue 6: Legal implications of issuing multiple reassessment notices:
                          The Court referred to legal precedents and established principles regarding the impermissibility of issuing multiple reassessment notices for the same assessment year during ongoing reassessment proceedings. Citing relevant judgments, the Court emphasized the need for adherence to statutory limitations on issuing such notices.

                          Issue 7: Compliance with Supreme Court judgments:
                          The Court upheld the petitioner's arguments regarding the non-disposal of objections and the violation of natural justice principles. Quashing the second notice issued during ongoing reassessment proceedings, the Court remanded the matter for fresh assessment, directing the Assessing Officer to decide on objections in compliance with the Supreme Court's guidelines within a specified timeframe. The Court emphasized the importance of following legal precedents and ensuring procedural fairness in assessment proceedings.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found