Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of design engineering and site run imported along with fermenters could be included in the assessable value of the fermenters under the Customs Valuation Rules.
Analysis: The assessment of the design engineering and site run under Chapter 49 had not culminated in a clearance for home consumption and therefore did not conclude the valuation exercise for the purpose of the fermenters. Under Rule 9(1)(b), inclusion was not justified because there was no free supply by the buyer to the overseas supplier and the engineering/design material was not necessary for production of the imported fermenters themselves. Under Rule 9(1)(e), inclusion was not justified because the record did not show that purchase of the design engineering and site run was a condition precedent for sale of the fermenters. Mere common purchase order, common invoice, or common airway bill did not make the items inseparable for customs valuation. Goods imported under the same contract still had to be assessed on their own merits unless a recognised exception applied.
Conclusion: The value of the design engineering and site run could not be added to the assessable value of the fermenters and the valuation demand failed.
Ratio Decidendi: For customs valuation, unrelated imported items cannot be clubbed merely because they are bought together; inclusion under Rule 9(1)(b) or Rule 9(1)(e) requires a legally established free supply or a proven condition of sale, not merely a common contract, invoice, or use.