Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the confiscation of the imported goods and the imposition of redemption fine were justified when the import was made under a revalidated imprest licence after the authorities had issued a fresh endorsement permitting import of OGL items not specifically banned under the prevailing policy.
Analysis: The petitioners imported the goods after the earlier endorsement had been altered in accordance with the judicial direction that the licence would be valid for import of OGL items except items specifically banned under the current policy. The import was made before the legal position on the scope of permissible imports had become finally settled. On those facts, the import could not be treated as mala fide or as a deliberate breach warranting confiscation. Once the import was found bona fide, the consequential order of confiscation and the redemption fine could not be sustained. In the connected matters, the same reasoning applied to the other consignments imported under the same licence and during the same period.
Conclusion: The confiscation orders were set aside and the redemption fines were directed to be refunded where already paid; in the remaining matters the petitioners were permitted to clear the goods on payment of duty and demurrage, with appropriate detention certificates to be issued.